

Set in the not-so-distant past — 2023
When the AI takeover was still speculative, not inevitable — Doomers is a two-act corporate psychodrama about messianic founders, money cults, and the delusions of control. It already feels retro.

September 1st, 9th, 29th & 30th
〰️
7pm
〰️
TWO80 Cabaret, Surry Hills
〰️
September 1st, 9th, 29th & 30th 〰️ 7pm 〰️ TWO80 Cabaret, Surry Hills 〰️
September 7th
〰️
2pm & 7pm
〰️
Tom Mann Theatre, Surry Hills
〰️
September 7th 〰️ 2pm & 7pm 〰️ Tom Mann Theatre, Surry Hills 〰️
MEET THE TEAM
As a director, I was drawn to how well the script balanced satire with sincerity. Rather than offering a black-and-white moral take, DOOMERS captures the complexity of our moment—the hubris, confusion, and human failure behind the gleaming tech façade.
Tonally, the play swings between farce and realism. Moments of brutal honesty sit alongside absurd humour and corporate jargon gone rogue. My vision is to strip away the mythos surrounding tech CEOs and innovators, exposing their dysfunctional, almost family-like dynamics. They’re no different from the rest of us: flawed, scared, posturing for relevance. In doing so, DOOMERS holds a mirror up to society—not to judge, but to expose and provoke.
I’m not interested in answering the question of where AI will land in all this—whether it will bring order or accelerate collapse. Instead, I want to live in the discomfort of not knowing. This production doesn’t offer certainty. I want to lean into the ambiguity, the speculation—where fear and fascination blur, and where the future remains unresolved.
What I’ve loved most about working on DOOMERS is the way we’ve been able to drop into the world together—not from above, but from within. Rather than directing from the outside, I’ve found the richest moments come when we’re immersed, when we are the doomers. That’s when the unexpected happens. Some of my favourite beats weren’t written as comedy, but became hilarious through us playing around with it. It’s in that instinctual space, where we stop analysing and start embodying, that DOOMERS really takes shape.
DIRECTORS STATEMENT
- Victoria Lenehan
Andy Ostojic is playing RICHARD
Former founder who cashed out and moved to Berlin when he saw where things were headed. One of MindMesh's first investors, now more interested in watching the inevitable tragedy unfold than preventing it. His amused cynicism masks a deeper disappointment in what Silicon Valley has become.
-
I've gotten to know more of Richard's personalities. I think there are at least four.
-
So I think there's definitely a toddler. There is a sort of Dr. Evil, Montgomery Burns character. There is a valley girl, a mean girl. A sassy queen.
-
He's very blunt as well so there's sort of like a... he likes to lecture... so I think there's some kind of like ‘a dad’ but like an unkind dad that doesn't listen.
Richie Clarke is playing CHARLIE
Board member and veteran tech executive. A pragmatist whose determination to find middle ground may be his blind spot.
-
I’d say Doomers is a fairly accurate portrayal of corporate life and its limits — the point where reality hits a wall. And we see that all through the play, as new, humorous characters hit that wall too. In the Doomers world, reality is life — and its opposite is corporate. I actually think doomers are optimists. What they imagine is kind of the best-case scenario: yes, the world ends, but convenience has already destroyed our motivation to exist.
Apollo Zephyr is playing ELI
Influential AI doom blogger and former MindMesh employee. Takes smug satisfaction in watching his worst predictions come true.
-
The writing brings out this goofy, energized side of me, like a crazy hermit on mushrooms. At first, Eli feels like an antagonist, chill and detached because he has no real stakes. But by the end, he’s not just butting heads — he’s trying to show that it’s better to do mushrooms and accept collapse than panic. He’s comedic relief, yeah, but it’s intentional — he throws himself under the bus to get everyone else out of their seriousness.
Sam Goldrick is playing HARRIET
Board member and former NSA official. Realizes that overseeing AI development may be harder than overseeing intelligence agencies.
-
It’s less about defence itself and more about how politics and power interrelate with technology — especially with its alignment to the private sector and capitalism. That blending of church and state is something we’re seeing now in our systems. Harriet’s role on the board is about representing humanity — she truly believes she’s on the right side of history. But how that plays out also shows the hubris of that belief in many ways.
1st - 30th September
BOOK
NOW
@SydneyDramaturgical
Tom Mann Theatre
Two80 Cabaret